An evaluation of the TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) Antibiotics Toolkit to improve antimicrobial stewardship in primary care is it fit for purpose?
Open Access
- 1 August 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Family Practice
- Vol. 35 (4), 461-467
- https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx131
Abstract
Background. The TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) Antibiotics Toolkit aims to improve antimicrobial prescribing in primary care through guidance, interactive workshops with action planning, patient facing educational and audit materials. Objective. To explore GPs', nurses' and other stakeholders' views of TARGET. Design. Mixed methods. Method. In 2014, 40 UK GP staff and 13 stakeholders participated in interviews or focus groups. We analysed data using a thematic framework and normalization process theory (NPT). Results. Two hundred and sixty-nine workshop participants completed evaluation forms, and 40 GP staff, 4 trainers and 9 relevant stakeholders participated in interviews (29) or focus groups (24). GP staffs were aware of the issues around antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and how it related to their prescribing. Most participants stated that TARGET as a whole was useful. Participants suggested the workshop needed less background on AMR, be centred around clinical cases and allow more action planning time. Participants particularly valued comparison of their practice antibiotic prescribing with others and the TARGET-Treating Your Infection leaflet. The leaflet needed greater accessibility via GP computer systems. Due to time, cost, accessibility and competing priorities, many GP staff had not fully utilized all resources, especially the audit and educational materials. Conclusions. We found evidence that the workshop is likely to be more acceptable and engaging if based around clinical scenarios, with less on AMR and more time on action planning. Greater promotion of TARGET, through Clinical Commissioning Group's (CCG's) and professional bodies, may improve uptake. Patient facing resources should be made accessible through computer shortcuts built into general practice software.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of primary care antimicrobial stewardship outreach on antibiotic use by general practice staff: pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the TARGET antibiotics workshopJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2018
- Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14The Lancet, 2016
- Parents’ and clinicians’ views of an interactive booklet about respiratory tract infections in children: a qualitative process evaluation of the EQUIP randomised controlled trialBMC Family Practice, 2013
- One size does not fit all: evaluating an intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitisBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Awareness of antibiotic resistance and antibiotic prescribing in UTI treatment: A qualitative study among primary care physicians in SwedenScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2013
- An analysis of the development and implementation of a smartphone application for the delivery of antimicrobial prescribing policy: lessons learntJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2012
- Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessmentBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2010
- Effect of using an interactive booklet about childhood respiratory tract infections in primary care consultations on reconsulting and antibiotic prescribing: a cluster randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2009
- Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process TheoryImplementation Science, 2009
- Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?Research in Nursing & Health, 2008