Evaluating use and outcomes of mobility technology: A multiple stakeholder analysis
- 25 July 2012
- journal article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
- Vol. 8 (4), 294-304
- https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2012.735745
Abstract
Purpose: This qualitative, multi-site study compared and contrasted the outcomes of mobility technology (MT) and the factors influencing these outcomes from the perspective of MT users, caregivers, and professionals involved in MT service delivery. Method: Qualitative focus groups were held in the USA and Canada with multiple stakeholder groups (consumer: n = 45, caregiver: n = 10, service provider: n = 10). Data were analyzed thematically. Results: MT outcomes were conceptualized by participants as a match between expectations for MT and the actual outcomes experienced. Several factors influenced the match including a) MT features, b) environmental factors (e.g. built/physical environment, societal context of acceptance, MT delivery systems/policies), and c) the ability to self-manage the interaction across person, technology and environment, which involved constant negotiation and strategizing. Stakeholders identified MT outcomes that corresponded to ICF levels including body structure and function, activity, and participation across environments; however, varied on their importance and influence on MT impact. Conclusions: The conceptual fit model and factors related to self-management of MT represent new knowledge and provide a framework for stakeholder-based evaluation of MT outcomes. Implications for MT assessment, service delivery, outcomes research, and interventions are discussed.Implications for RehabilitationThere is a need for research on mobility technology (MT) such as canes, walkers and wheelchairs that documents the experiences of people with disabilities using MT. This qualitative, multi-site study compared and contrasted the outcomes of MT and the factors influencing these outcomes from the perspective of MT users, caregivers, and professionals involved in MT service delivery. Results from this research inform our understanding of MT use, assessment and outcomes. Implications for RehabilitationKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- State of the science on wheeled mobility and seating measuring the health, activity and participation of wheelchair usersDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2007
- Focus group research and “the patient's view”Social Science & Medicine, 2006
- Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment*Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2005
- Psychometric and Administrative Properties of Measures Used in Assistive Technology Device Outcomes ResearchAssistive Technology, 2005
- Musculoskeletal pain in Europe: its impact and a comparison of population and medical perceptions of treatment in eight European countriesAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2004
- Lower Extremity Performance in Nondisabled Older Persons as a Predictor of Subsequent HospitalizationThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2000
- Lower Extremity Function and Subsequent Disability: Consistency Across Studies, Predictive Models, and Value of Gait Speed Alone Compared With the Short Physical Performance BatteryThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2000
- Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature reviewSocial Science & Medicine, 1999
- Outcomes Measurement of Assistive Technologies: An Institutional Case StudyAssistive Technology, 1996
- Validation in Inquiry-Guided Research: The Role of Exemplars in Narrative StudiesHarvard Educational Review, 1990