Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency
- 1 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 63 (8), 875-882
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.025
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research Council's Health Services Research Collaboration
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overviews of ReviewsPublished by Wiley ,2008
- Using mixed treatment comparisons and meta-regression to perform indirect comparisons to estimate the efficacy of biologic treatments in rheumatoid arthritisStatistics in Medicine, 2006
- Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment ComparisonsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2006
- Systematic reviews of meta-analyses: applications and limitationsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidenceBMJ, 2005
- Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse dataStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and FitJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Improvements in self-concept after treatment of nocturnal enuresis: Randomized controlled trialThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1987