Eldercare in the United States: Inadequate, Inequitable, but Not a Lost Cause
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Feminist Economics
- Vol. 11 (2), 37-51
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700500115845
Abstract
Eldercare, like other forms of care work, is often taken for granted and undervalued. The burdens as well as the failures of providing care for the elderly are often borne disproportionately by women. This paper documents inequality of access and low quality of care for the elderly in the United States. It argues that public funds used to subsidize nursing homes are poorly spent and that profit-maximizing competition in the nursing home industry adversely affects the quality of care provided. In seeking to address these problems, policy-makers can learn important lessons from several different sources. The experiences of several European countries, current regulatory efforts in the state of Massachusetts, and more decentralized volunteer efforts to promote humane visions of eldercare all offer some hope for the future.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gender And Elder Care In ChinaGender & Society, 2003
- Extended Care Career Ladder Initiative (ECCLI) Round 2: Evaluation ReportSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Who Cares?Published by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) ,2001
- Extended Care Career Ladder Initiative (ECCLI): Baseline Evaluation Report of a Massachusetts Nursing Home InitiativeSSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Economics Standards and Lists: Proposed Antidotes for Feminist EconomistsFeminist Economics, 2001
- Beyond ‘unloving care’: linking human resource management and patient care quality in nursing homesThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2000
- Beyond Economic ManPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1993