The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: testing gravity with redshift space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 July 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Vol. 443 (2), 1065-1089
- https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1051
Abstract
We analyse the anisotropic clustering of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) CMASS Data Release 11 (DR11) sample, which consists of 690 827 galaxies in the redshift range 0.43 < z < 0.7 and has a sky coverage of 8498 deg2. We perform our analysis in Fourier space using a power spectrum estimator suggested by Yamamoto et al. We measure the multipole power spectra in a self-consistent manner for the first time in the sense that we provide a proper way to treat the survey window function and the integral constraint, without the commonly used assumption of an isotropic power spectrum and without the need to split the survey into subregions. The main cosmological signals exploited in our analysis are the baryon acoustic oscillations and the signal of redshift space distortions, both of which are distorted by the Alcock–Paczynski effect. Together, these signals allow us to constrain the distance ratio DV(zeff)/rs(zd) = 13.89 ± 0.18, the Alcock–Paczynski parameter FAP(zeff) = 0.679 ± 0.031 and the growth rate of structure f (zeff)σ8(zeff) = 0.419 ± 0.044 at the effective redshift zeff = 0.57. We emphasize that our constraints are robust against possible systematic uncertainties. In order to ensure this, we perform a detailed systematics study against CMASS mock galaxy catalogues and N-body simulations. We find that such systematics will lead to 3.1 per cent uncertainty for fσ8 if we limit our fitting range to k = 0.01–0.20 h Mpc−1, where the statistical uncertainty is expected to be three times larger. We did not find significant systematic uncertainties for DV/rs or FAP. Combining our data set with Planck to test General Relativity (GR) through the simple γ-parametrization, where the growth rate is given by $$f(z) = \Omega ^{\gamma }_{\rm m}(z)$$, reveals a ∼2σ tension between the data and the prediction by GR. The tension between our result and GR can be traced back to a tension in the clustering amplitude σ8 between CMASS and Planck.
Keywords
This publication has 115 references indexed in Scilit:
- SPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION AND REDSHIFT MEASUREMENT FOR THE SDSS-III BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEYThe Astronomical Journal, 2012
- Distribution function approach to redshift space distortionsJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2011
- Challenges to the DGP model from horizon-scale growth and geometryPhysical Review D, 2008
- Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrixAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2006
- Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large‐Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red GalaxiesThe Astrophysical Journal, 2005
- Theoretical uncertainty in baryon oscillationsPhysical Review D, 2004
- Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann‐Robertson‐Walker ModelsThe Astrophysical Journal, 2000
- Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift SupernovaeThe Astrophysical Journal, 1999
- The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric SystemThe Astronomical Journal, 1996
- Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission RegionsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1970