Closing the gap in postfracture care at the population level: a randomized controlled trial
- 19 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 184 (3), 290-296
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111158
Abstract
Background: Postfracture care is suboptimal, and strategies to address this major gap in care are necessary. We investigated whether notifications sent by mail to physicians and patients would lead to improved postfracture care. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00594789) in the province of Manitoba, Canada, from June 2008 to May 2010. Using medical claims data, we identified 4264 men and women age 50 years or older who recently reported major fractures, and who had not undergone recent bone mineral density testing or treatment for osteoporosis. Participants were randomized to three groups: group 1 received usual care (n = 1480), patients in group 2 had mailed notification of the fracture sent to their primary care physicians (n = 1363), and group 3 had notifications sent to both physicians and patients (n = 1421). Bone mineral density testing and the start of pharmacologic treatment for osteoporosis within the following 12 months were documented. Results: Among participants in group 1 (usual care), 15.8% of women and 7.6% of men underwent testing for bone mineral density or started pharmacologic treatment for osteoporosis. Outcome measures improved among participants in group 2 (30.3% of women and 19.0% of men, both p < 0.001) and group 3 (34.0% of women and 19.8% of men, both p < 0.001). No additional benefit was seen with patient notification in addition to physician notification. Combining groups 2 and 3, the absolute increase for the combined end point of bone mineral density testing or pharmacologic treatment was 14.9% (16.4% among women, 11.8% among men). The number needed to notify to change patient care was 7 (6 for women, 6 for men). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) to change patient care in group 2 was 2.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01–2.98); for group 3 the OR was 2.82 (95% CI 2.33–3.43). Interpretation: This notification system provides a relatively simple way to enhance post-fracture care.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does a History of Non-Vertebral Fracture Identify Women Without Osteoporosis for Treatment?Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trialCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2008
- High-Trauma Fractures and Low Bone Mineral Density in Older Women and MenJAMA, 2007
- Zoledronic Acid and Clinical Fractures and Mortality after Hip FractureThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Osteoporosis Improvement: A Large-Scale Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient and Primary Care Physician EducationJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2007
- Can an Online Osteoporosis Lecture Increase Physician Knowledge and Improve Patient Care?Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2007
- Fragility Fractures and the Osteoporosis Care Gap: An International PhenomenonSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2006
- Effective Initiation of Osteoporosis Diagnosis and Treatment for Patients with a Fragility Fracture in an Orthopaedic EnvironmentPublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,2006
- Construction and Validation of a Population-Based Bone Densitometry DatabaseJournal of Clinical Densitometry, 2005
- A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture riskBone, 2004