Systematic scoping review identifies heterogeneity in outcomes measured in adolescent depression clinical trials
- 16 June 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 126, 71-79
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.013
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to considerTrials, 2012
- Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core OutcomesJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2012
- The use and abuse of multiple outcomes in randomized controlled depression trialsContemporary Clinical Trials, 2011
- The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database — Update and Key IssuesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMedBMJ, 2010
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008
- A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in ChildrenPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviewsTrials, 2007
- Diagnosis and Measurement of Adolescent Depression: A Review of Commonly Utilized InstrumentsJournal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 2001