Revising the Daily Values May Affect Food Fortification and in Turn Nutrient Intake Adequacy
Open Access
- 1 December 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 143 (12), 1999-2006
- https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.113.181099
Abstract
The Nutrition Facts panel on food labels in the United States currently displays Daily Values (DVs) that are based on outdated RDAs. The FDA has indicated that it plans to update the DVs based on the newer Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs), but there is controversy regarding the best method for calculating new DVs from the DRIs. To better understand the implications of DV revisions, assuming that manufacturers choose to maintain current label claims for micronutrients from voluntarily fortified foods, we modeled intake of 8 micronutrients using NHANES 2007–2008 data and 2 potential methods for calculating DVs: the population-weighted Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and the population-coverage RDA. In each scenario, levels of fortified nutrients were adjusted to maintain the current %DV. Usual nutrient intakes and percentages with usual intakes less than the EAR were estimated for the U.S. population and subpopulations aged ≥4 y (n = 7976). For most nutrients, estimates of the percentage of the U.S. population with intakes below the EAR were similar regardless of whether the DV corresponded to the population-weighted EAR or the population-coverage RDA. Potential decreases were observed in adequacy of nutrients of concern for women of childbearing age, namely iron and folate (up to 9% and 3%, respectively), adequacy of calcium among children (up to 6%), and adequacy of vitamin A intakes in the total population (5%) assuming use of the population-weighted EAR compared with the population-coverage RDA for setting the DV. Results of this modeling exercise will help to inform decisions in revising the DVs.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- USDA Food and Nutrient Databases Provide the Infrastructure for Food and Nutrition Research, Policy, and PracticeJournal of Nutrition, 2013
- Updated US Department of Agriculture Food Patterns Meet Goals of the 2010 Dietary GuidelinesJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2012
- Foods, Fortificants, and Supplements: Where Do Americans Get Their Nutrients?Journal of Nutrition, 2011
- The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2008
- Which Dietary Reference Intake Is Best Suited to Serve as the Basis for Nutrition Labeling for Daily Values?Journal of Nutrition, 2006
- Use of population-weighted Estimated Average Requirements as a basis for Daily Values on food labelsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2006
- Recommended Dietary Allowances should be used to set Daily Values for nutrition labelingThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2006
- When is an Individual an Individual Versus a Member of a Group? An Issue in the Application of the Dietary Reference IntakesNutrition Reviews, 2006
- When is an Individual an Individual Versus a Member of a Group? An Issue in the Application of the Dietary Reference IntakesNutrition Reviews, 2006
- Modeling the Level of Fortification and Post-Fortification Assessments: U.S. ExperienceNutrition Reviews, 2004