Microsurgical Reconstruction in Recurrent Oral Cancer: Use of a Second Free Flap in the Same Patient

Abstract

Primary microsurgical reconstruction is the treatment of choice for ablative defects of oral carcinoma. As a result of this trend, more and more patients with recurrent oral carcinoma who have been initially treated with surgical excision and reconstructed with free flaps are being seen. However, a second microsurgical reconstruction attempt in these cases raises questions about the flap choices, availability of recipient vessels, and effects of previous treatment modalities. Herein, 35 patients with perioral carcinoma who had two successive tumor resections and reconstruction with free flaps on each occasion are presented. A total of 75 free tissue transfers were carried out for the first and second reconstructions. After the first tumor resection, 28 radial forearm fasciocutaneous flaps, 7 fibula osteoseptocutaneous flaps, 1 iliac osteomyocutaneous flap, and 2 rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps were used. For reconstruction after the recurrence, 17 radial forearm fasciocutaneous flaps, 13 fibula osteoseptocutaneous flaps, 3 rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, 2 anterolateral thigh flaps, 1 jejunum flap, and 1 tensor fasciae latae flap were used. More vascularized bone transfers were performed during the second reconstruction since the excision for the recurrence frequently required segmental mandibulectomy. The complete flap survival rate was 97.3 percent and 94.6 percent with a reexploration rate of 7.9 percent and 13.5 percent for the first and second free tissue transfers, respectively. The mean follow-up time throughout the procedures was 37.5 months. Disease-free interval between reconstructions was 20.8 months. At the time of evaluation, 54.3 percent of the patients were surviving an average of 19 months since the second reconstruction. The results suggest that free flaps represent an important option in reconstruction of recurrent perioral carcinoma cases undergoing reexcision. When used in this indication they are as safe and effective as the initial procedure. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 103: 829, 1999.)