Exergetic life cycle analysis for the selection of chromatographic separation processes in the pharmaceutical industry: preparative HPLC versus preparative SFC
- 16 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Green Chemistry
- Vol. 11 (7), 1007-1012
- https://doi.org/10.1039/b901151j
Abstract
Today, environmentally responsible chemistry is of huge importance in the wake of sustainable production. In the field of the fine chemical and pharmaceutical industry, preparative supercritical fluid chromatography (Prep-SFC) and preparative high performance liquid chromatography (Prep-HPLC) are widely used chiral separation techniques. Prep-SFC is often named as a green alternative for Prep-HPLC without having a thorough assessment of the greenness. However, if metrics are used for process selection with respect to green chemistry, they mainly show three shortcomings: (1) a narrow system boundary approach is used; (2) energy requirements are barely taken into account and (3) if energy requirements are considered, there is a differentiation in mass and energy inputs. Taking into account these shortcomings, Prep-HPLC and Prep-SFC are now compared and evaluated for their integral resource consumption. The evaluation is performed on a specific enantiomeric separation using exergetic life cycle analysis within enlarging system boundaries α, β and γ. Within the α system boundary (process level), Prep-HPLC requires 26.3% more resources quantified in exergy than the Prep-SFC separation due to its inherent higher use of organic solvents. Within the β system boundary (plant level), Prep-HPLC requires 29.1% more resources quantified in exergy than Prep-SFC. However, the Cumulative Exergy Extracted from the Natural Environment (CEENE) to deliver all mass and energy flows to the α and β system boundary via the overall industrial metabolism shows that Prep-SFC requires 34.3% more resources than Prep-HPLC. The poor score of Prep-SFC in the γ system boundary is attributed to the high CEENE value related to the production of liquid carbon dioxide and the use of electricity for heating and cooling. It can be concluded that for this case, the most sustainable process as for the integral resource consumption is Prep-HPLC, unlike the general perception that Prep-SFC outperforms Prep-HPLC.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exergy analysis of freeze drying of pharmaceuticals in vials on traysInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2008
- Green chemistry tools to influence a medicinal chemistry and research chemistry based organisationGreen Chemistry, 2007
- Integral resource management by exergy analysis for the selection of a separation process in the pharmaceutical industryGreen Chemistry, 2007
- Strategic use of preparative chiral chromatography for the synthesis of a preclinical pharmaceutical candidateChirality, 2007
- New trends for design towards sustainability in chemical engineering: Green engineeringChemical Engineering Journal, 2007
- The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA databaseJournal of Cleaner Production, 2005
- Chromatography as an Enabling Technology in Pharmaceutical Process Development: Expedited Multikilogram Preparation of a Candidate HIV Protease InhibitorOrganic Process Research & Development, 2004
- GREEN CHEMISTRY PROGRESS REPORTChemical & Engineering News, 2002
- GREEN CHEMISTRY FOR PHARMAChemical & Engineering News, 2002
- So you think your process is green, how do you know? — Using principles of sustainability to determine what is green – a corporate perspectiveGreen Chemistry, 2001