The Myers-Briggs Personality Type and Its Relationship to Computer Programming
- 1 March 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Journal of Research on Computing in Education
- Vol. 26 (3), 358-370
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1994.10782096
Abstract
This research investigated whether college students with certain personality types (as measured by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) performed better in an introductory programming class than students with the opposite personality types. A pilot study of 24 students and a follow-up study of 114 college students taking an introductory programming class indicated that sensing students performed better on programming assignments than intuitive students, and that judging students achieved higher programming averages than perceptive students. Additionally, it was found that personality type influenced achievement in programming performance, but did not influence achievement on exams or overall average.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- What best predicts computer proficiency?Communications of the ACM, 1989
- Affirmative: In Support of Researching the Myers‐Briggs Type IndicatorJournal of Counseling & Development, 1989
- Causal attribution by sensing and intuitive types during diagnostic problem solvingInstructional Science, 1987
- Novices on the computer: a review of the literatureInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1986
- Cognitive style, personality type, and learning ability as factors in predicting the success of the beginning programming studentACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 1986
- Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing?Management Science, 1983
- Studying programmer behavior experimentallyCommunications of the ACM, 1980
- An Assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type IndicatorJournal of Personality Assessment, 1977
- Managerial problem-solving stylesBusiness Horizons, 1975
- PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF PERSONALITY DESCRIPTION, CLASSIFICATION AND DIAGNOSISBritish Journal of Psychology, 1964