Accuracy of traditional and novel serology tests for predicting cross-protection in foot-and-mouth disease vaccinated cattle
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Vaccine
- Vol. 32 (4), 433-436
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Avidity and subtyping of specific antibodies applied to the indirect assessment of heterologous protection against Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in cattleVaccine, 2012
- Evaluation of cross-protection between O1 Manisa and O1 Campos in cattle vaccinated with foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine incorporating different payloads of inactivated O1 Manisa antigenVaccine, 2011
- Confidence in indirect assessment of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency and vaccine matching carried out by liquid phase ELISA and virus neutralization testsVaccine, 2010
- Some guidelines for determining foot-and-mouth disease vaccine strain matching by serologyVaccine, 2008
- Foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency testing in cattle using homologous and heterologous challenge strains: Precision of the “Protection against Podal Generalisation” testVaccine, 2008
- High potency vaccines induce protection against heterologous challenge with foot-and-mouth disease virusVaccine, 2008
- European Pharmacopoeia foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency testing in cattle: Between test variability and its consequencesVaccine, 2007
- ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in RBioinformatics, 2005
- Comparison between in vitro neutralization titres and in vivo protection against homologous and heterologous challenge induced by vaccines prepared from two serologically distinct variants of foot-and-mouth disease virus, serotype A22Journal of General Virology, 1992
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960