Signs and symptoms of acromegaly at diagnosis: the physician’s and the patient’s perspectives in the ACRO-POLIS study
Open Access
- 29 September 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Endocrine
- Vol. 63 (1), 120-129
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1764-4
Abstract
Purpose Acromegaly is characterized by a broad range of manifestations. Early diagnosis is key to treatment success, but is often delayed as symptomatology overlaps with common disorders. We investigated sign-and-symptom associations, demographics, and clinical characteristics at acromegaly diagnosis. Methods Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter non-interventional study conducted at 25 hospital departments in France that treat acromegaly (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02012127). Adults diagnosed with acromegaly < 5 years were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from medical reports and patient questionnaires. Sign-and-symptom associations were assessed by multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). Results Overall, 472 patients were included in the analyses. MCA was unsuccessful in identifying sign-and-symptom associations at diagnosis. Endocrinologists (29.5% patients) and other clinical specialists (37.2% patients) were commonly first to suspect acromegaly. Morphologic manifestations (83.7–87.9% patients), snoring syndrome (81.4% patients), and asthenia (79.2% patients) were frequently present at diagnosis; differences were found between sexes for specific manifestations. Rates of discrepancy between patient- and physician-reported manifestations were highest for functional signs. Earliest manifestations prior to diagnosis, according to how they were detected, were enlarged hands and feet (6.4 ± 6.8 and 6.2 ± 6.9 years, functional signs), hypertension (6.6 ± 7.5 years, complementary examination) and carpal/cubital tunnel syndrome (5.7 ± 6.7 years, functional signs with complementary examination). Conclusions Results confirm the broad range of manifestations at diagnosis and delay in recognizing the disease. We identified early manifestations and sex differences that may aid physicians in diagnosing acromegaly. Discrepancy rates suggest physicians should obtain the patient’s perspective and seek functional signs during diagnosis.Funding Information
- Ipsen
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient perspectives on the impact of acromegaly: results from individual and group interviewsPatient Preference and Adherence, 2014
- Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis of AcromegalyInternational Journal of Endocrinology, 2012
- Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Features at diagnosis of 324 patients with acromegaly did not change from 1981 to 2006: acromegaly remains under‐recognized and under‐diagnosedClinical Endocrinology, 2010
- A meta-analysis of the effect of lowering serum levels of GH and IGF-I on mortality in acromegalyActa Endocrinologica, 2008
- AcromegalyBMJ, 2007
- AcromegalyMedicine, 1994
- Determinants of clinical outcome and survival in acromegalyClinical Endocrinology, 1994
- ACROMEGALYClinical Endocrinology, 1987
- Multivariate Analysis: The Need for Data, and other ProblemsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1975