IGRT in rectal cancer
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Medical Journals Sweden AB in Acta Oncologica
- Vol. 47 (7), 1317-1324
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802256459
Abstract
To date, no great interest has been shown in the clinical implementation of recent Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) modalities in rectal cancer since only a few studies have been published on this issue. This may be explained by the fact that with current treatment modalities locoregional recurrences are already very low (around 10%). However, there is still room for improvement in treatment of high risk patients (cT3 CRM+, cT4, N+). In these patients better results may be obtained improving radiation technique from 2D to 3D, which showed to be more reliable in terms of target coverage. Also, when higher doses are delivered, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) may be used to spare small bowel. But before employing 3D irradiation or IMRT, a proper definition of our clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) is needed. The CTV should encompass the tumour site, the mesorectum and the lateral nodes, recognized as the most likely sites of local recurrence, with different incidence according to tumour stage. Recent studies discussed the correct delineation of these target volumes in respect of tumour site and stage. From the preliminary results of a study conducted in Rome University 2D planning seemed insufficient to cover the different target volumes especially in T4 patients compared to 3D planning. Also an appropriate PTV margin is necessary in order to manage set-up errors and organ motion. Particularly in these patients, the knowledge of mesorectal movement is required to avoid target missing. Large mesorectal displacements were observed in a study carried out in Leuven University in collaboration with Rome University. A systematic review of the literature together with the data from these first experiences led to the awareness that IGRT could help us to follow the target volume and organs at risk during the treatment, allowing adjustments to improve accuracy in dose delivery, especially when dose escalation studies are planned in the treatment of rectal cancer.status: publisheKeywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- The TME Trial After a Median Follow-up of 6 YearsAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Distribution and patterns of lymph nodes metastases and micrometastases in the mesorectum of rectal cancerJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2007
- Imaging and Alignment for Image-Guided Radiation TherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Development of dose delivery verification by PET imaging of photonuclear reactions following high energy photon therapyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2006
- Radiological findings do not support lateral residual tumour as a major cause of local recurrence of rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: Long Lasting Benefits From Radiotherapy on Survival and Local Recurrence RateJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Technical aspects of image-based treatment planning of rectal carcinomaSeminars in Radiation Oncology, 2003
- Role of bipedal lymphangiogram in radiation treatment planning for cervix cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1993
- RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCERThe Lancet, 1986
- Lymph node nomenclature in gynecologic oncologyGynecologic Oncology, 1986