Connecting patients, researchers and clinical genetics services: the experiences of participants in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS)
Open Access
- 14 May 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 23 (2), 152-158
- https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.86
Abstract
Population-based genetic research may produce information that has clinical implications for participants and their family. Researchers notify participants or their next of kin (NoK) about the availability of genetic information via a notification letter; however, many subsequently do not contact a family cancer centre (FCC) to clarify their genetic status. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine research participants’ experience of receiving a notification letter and the factors that influenced contact with an FCC. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with research participants (n=10) or their NoK (n=15) who had received a notification letter following participation in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study. There were a number of factors which impacted participants’ access to genetic counselling at an FCC. Some participants had unmet information and support needs, which were addressed by their participation in this psychosocial interview study. Recruitment and participation in this study therefore inadvertently increased a number of participants’ intention to contact an FCC. For others, participation in this study facilitated access to an FCC. Recommendations are proposed regarding future notification as well as implications for clinical practice. An approach that also provides opportunity to address research participants’ support and informational needs before contacting a clinical genetics service as well as practical guidance for accessing genetic services would facilitate timely and smooth access for research participants who are interested in following up clinically relevant genetic test results.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The responses of research participants and their next of kin to receiving feedback of genetic test results following participation in the Australian Ovarian Cancer StudyGenetics in Medicine, 2013
- Improving mutation notification when new genetic information is identified in research: a trial of two strategies in familial breast cancerGenetics in Medicine, 2013
- BRCA Mutation Frequency and Patterns of Treatment Response in BRCA Mutation–Positive Women With Ovarian Cancer: A Report From the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- The legal risks of returning results of genomics researchGenetics in Medicine, 2012
- Disclosing Individual CDKN2A Research Results to Melanoma Survivors: Interest, Impact, and Demands on ResearchersCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2011
- Returning Individual Research Results: Development of a Cancer Genetics Education and Risk Communication ProtocolJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2010
- Association of Risk-Reducing Surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Cancer Risk and MortalityJAMA, 2010
- Meta-analysis of Risk Reduction Estimates Associated With Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation CarriersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic ResearchAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2008
- The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectivesEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2006