Assessing Information and Decision Preferences of Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Partners
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Cancer Nursing
- Vol. 25 (1), 42-49
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200202000-00009
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify and compare information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners at the time of diagnosis. A convenience sample of 80 couples was recruited from The Prostate Centre in Vancouver, Canada. Participants used a computerized version of two previously used measures with this population: Control Preferences Scale and Information Survey Questionnaire. Results showed that men had a preference to play either an active or a collaborative role in decision making with their physician (92.5%) and partners (100%). The majority (55%) of partners wanted to play a collaborative role in treatment decision making. Couples identified prognosis, stage of disease, treatment options, and side effects as the top 4 information preferences. Men ranked information on sexuality more important than partners, and partners ranked information on home self-care higher than men. Men who had sons, a positive family history, and lower levels of education ranked heredity risk significantly higher. Profiles of information categories did not differ according to role preferences of either men or partners. The computer program has been shown to be a reliable and acceptable method of assessing information and decision preferences of these couples. An individualized approach is suggested, given the high reliability of individual’s profiles.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Men with prostate cancerJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2000
- What prostate cancer patients should know: variation in professionals’ opinionsRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1998
- Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- The information needs of women newly diagnosed with breast cancerJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1995
- Oncologists' Perceptions of the Effects of Cancer Patients' Companions on Physician-Patient InteractionsJournal of Psychosocial Oncology, 1994
- Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patientsSocial Science & Medicine, 1988
- Informational needs of recently diagnosed cancer patientsCancer Nursing, 1987
- Weighting the Seriousness of Perceived Health Problems Using Thurstone's Method of Paired ComparisonsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1981
- Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: III. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumedPsychometrika, 1951