Effect of Capsular Injury on Acromioclavicular Joint Mechanics
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Vol. 83 (9), 1344-1351
- https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200109000-00009
Abstract
Traumatic disruption of the acromioclavicular joint capsule is associated with pain and instability after the injury and may lead to degenerative joint disease. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of transection of the acromioclavicular joint capsule on the kinematics and the in situ forces in the coracoclavicular ligaments in response to external loading conditions. Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were tested with use of a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The shoulders were subjected to three loading conditions (an anterior, posterior, and superior load of 70 N) in their intact state and after transection of the acromioclavicular joint capsule. Transection of the capsule resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) increase in anterior translation (6.4 mm) and posterior translation (3.6 mm) but not in superior translation (1.6 mm). The effect of capsule transection on the forces in the coracoclavicular ligaments was also significant (p < 0.05) in response to anterior and posterior loading but not in response to superior loading. However, differences were found between the forces in the trapezoid and conoid ligaments. Under an anterior load, the mean in situ force (and standard deviation) in the trapezoid increased from 14 +/- 14 N to 25 +/- 19 N, while the mean force in the conoid increased from 15 +/- 14 N to 49 +/- 23 N, or 227%. In contrast, in response to a posterior load, the mean in situ force in the trapezoid increased from 23 +/- 15 N to 38 +/- 23 N, or 66% (p < 0.05), while the mean force in the conoid increased only 9%. The large differences in the change of force in the conoid and trapezoid ligaments suggest that these ligaments should not be considered as one structure when surgical treatment is considered. Furthermore, transection of the capsule resulted in a shift of load to the coracoclavicular ligaments, which may render the intact coracoclavicular ligaments more likely to fail with anterior or posterior loading. The results of the present study also suggest that the intact coracoclavicular ligaments cannot compensate for the loss of capsular function during anterior-posterior loading as occurs in type-II acromioclavicular joint injuries.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ligament Mechanics During Three Degree-of-Freedom Motion at the Acromioclavicular JointAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2000
- Functional Evaluation of the Ligaments at the Acromioclavicular Joint during Anteroposterior and Superoinferior TranslationThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1997
- A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligamentsJournal of Biomechanics, 1996
- A new dynamic testing apparatus to study glenohumeral joint motionJournal of Biomechanics, 1995
- The Use of a Universal Force-Moment Sensor to Determine In-Situ Forces in Ligaments: A New MethodologyJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1995
- The Use of Robotics Technology to Study Human Joint Kinematics: A New MethodologyJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1993
- Shoulder strength following acromioclavicular injuryThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1985
- The fate of the acromioclavicular joint in athletic injuriesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1981
- Evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint fol lowi ng first- and second-degree sprainsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1978
- Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint: A plea for conservative treatmentThe American Journal of Surgery, 1942