Public‐private partnerships, outsourcing or shared service centres?
- 3 August 2010
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy
- Vol. 4 (3), 232-248
- https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161011065217
Abstract
Purpose – Organizations are looking for different ways of sourcing their activities to acquire various benefits. The purpose of this paper is to compare the strategic intents and motives for shared service centres (SSCs), outsourcing and public-private partnerships (PPPs) using three case studies. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is a combination of literature research and case study research. The case studies are analyzed using a framework for classifying the strategic intents. Findings – A large number of interrelated factors are found as drivers for selecting the various sourcing arrangements. It is found that the strategic intents underlying the decision to implement a PPP, SSC or outsourcing arrangements differ from each other. Outsourcing is mainly used to reduce costs for non-core activities or to gain access to expertise otherwise out-of-reach and, while a shared services arrangement is selected when an organization wants to improve service levels and reduce costs at the same time. Finally, PPPs are focused on developing new and innovative services and seem to accomplish most intents at the expense of higher risks. The intents have relatively subtle differences, compared to how significantly the arrangements differ. Research limitations/implications – This research is explorative in nature and revealed a large number of intents. Generalization of findings is not straightforward, as there is no uniform view on what constitutes SSCs and PPPs. This research helps to have insight in the basic differences, but needs to be further generalized by investigating a larger number of case studies. Practical implications – Public organizations are struggling to find the right sourcing arrangements. This research can help decision makers in making a choice between PPPs, SSCs and outsourcing arrangements. Originality/value – The primary value of this study is to understand the differences between the strategic intents underlying the use of these three sourcing arrangements.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- New service development in e‐government: identifying critical success factorsTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2010
- What is the value of eGovernment – and how can we actually realize it?Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2009
- Public sector information system critical success factorsTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2008
- Understanding IT governance for the operation of shared services in public service networksInternational Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 2007
- Improving shared service implementation: adopting lessons from the BPR movementBusiness Process Management Journal, 2006
- Getting the fundamentals wrong: woes of public–private partnerships in solid waste collection in three Ghanaian citiesPublic Administration and Development, 2004
- IT outsourcing evolution---Communications of the ACM, 2003
- Outsourcing information systems: drawing lessons from a banking case studyEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 2001
- An Empirical Investigation of Information Technology Sourcing Practices: Lessons from ExperienceMIS Quarterly, 1998
- IT outsourcing as strategic partnering: the case of the UK Inland RevenueEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 1998