Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning
- 1 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Contraception
- Vol. 88 (1), 24-30
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.010
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contraceptive failure in the United StatesContraception, 2011
- Pilot Evaluation of an Internet‐Based Natural Family Planning Education and Service ProgramJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 2011
- EFFICACY OF THE MARQUETTE METHOD OF NATURAL FAMILY PLANNINGMCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 2008
- Efficacy of Cervical Mucus Observations Plus Electronic Hormonal Fertility Monitoring as a Method of Natural Family PlanningJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 2007
- Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006
- Acceptability of a home monitor used to aid in conception: psychosocial factors and couple dynamicsContraception, 2006
- New Low‐ and High‐Tech Calendar Methods of Family PlanningJournal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 2005
- Efficacy of the new TwoDay Method of family planningFertility and Sterility, 2004
- Acceptability of Personal Hormone Monitoring for Contraception: Longitudinal and Contextual VariablesThe Journal of Social Psychology, 2002
- Nurse-midwives' knowledge and promotion of lactational amenorrhea and other natural family-planning methods for child spacingJournal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 2001