Development inside Urban Growth Boundaries: Oregon's Empirical Evidence of Contiguous Urban Form
- 31 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of the American Planning Association
- Vol. 64 (4), 424-440
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808976002
Abstract
Both popular and professional literatures have expounded on the problems (and sometimes the benefits) of urban sprawl. We all know it when we see it, but defining it in ways that facilitate measurement can be difficult. One part of the definition that can be measured is the degree to which development touches other development. Discontiguous development in urban areas suggests sprawl; contiguous development suggests a more compact urban form. This article reports evidence on whether and to what extent development inside urban growth boundaries (UGBs) of three Oregon communities is contiguous or dispersed. The case study method it uses provides a logical and replicable means for describing and quantifying urban development patterns. Data from the three UGB case studies are evaluated within a framework based on Oregon's land use policies. The article concludes that recent development inside UGBs tends to be contiguous to the urban core rather than dispersed, consistent with Oregon's policies for urban form, but that urban development patterns can be improved by applying additional urban growth management tools now being developed for inclusion in Oregon's planning program.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable?Journal of the American Planning Association, 1997
- Role of Indicators in Monitoring Growing Urban RegionsThe Case of Planning in India's National Capital RegionJournal of the American Planning Association, 1996
- THE CHANGING METROPOLITAN STRUCTURE OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA: LOCATIONS OF FUNCTIONS AND REGIONAL STRUCTURE IN A MULTINUCLEATED URBAN AREAUrban Geography, 1995
- Self-Fulfilling Prophecies?: Decentralization, Inner City Decline, and the Quality of Urban LifeJournal of the American Planning Association, 1992
- Growth Management Reconsidered: Good for the Town, Bad for the Nation? A CommentJournal of the American Planning Association, 1991
- Ideal Urban Form and Visions of the Good Life Florida's Growth Management DilemmaJournal of the American Planning Association, 1990
- Growth Management Good for the Town, Bad for the Nation?Journal of the American Planning Association, 1990
- Is Oregon's Farmland Preservation Program Working?Journal of the American Planning Association, 1986
- Land Speculation and Scattered Development; Failures in the Urban-Fringe Land MarketUrban Studies, 1973
- Myth versus Reality in Urban PlanningLand Economics, 1963