Complexity, Deconstruction and Relativism
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theory, Culture & Society
- Vol. 22 (5), 255-267
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405058052
Abstract
The acknowledgement that something is complex, it is argued, implies that our knowledge of it will always be limited. We cannot make complete, absolute or final claims about complex systems. Post-structuralism, and specifically deconstruction, make similar claims about knowledge in general. Arguments against deconstruction can, therefore, also be held against a critical form of complexity thinking and a defence of the view from complexity (as presented here) should take account of them. Three of these arguments are investigated: that deconstruction and complexity-thinking lead to relativism, that they are subject to the performative contradiction and that their claims are vague. It is shown that these critiques are not really effective and it is suggested that a responsible approach to complexity has to be provisional, i.e. modest, without being vague or relativistic.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vagueness: A Minimal TheoryMind, 2003
- The Sokal Affair and the History of CriticismCritical Inquiry, 2002
- BOUNDARIES, HIERARCHIES AND NETWORKS IN COMPLEX SYSTEMSInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 2001
- Special Editors' Introduction: What Is Complexity Science? A View from Different DirectionsEmergence, 2001
- Performative Powerlessness: A Response to Simon CritchleyConstellations, 2000
- Knowledge, Complexity, and UnderstandingEmergence, 2000
- Poststructuralism, Complexity and PoeticsTheory, Culture & Society, 2000
- Postmodernism, Derrida, and DifféranceInternational Philosophical Quarterly, 1999
- Working in the Philosophical Discourse of ModernityPhilosophy Today, 1996
- Articulation of Parts Explanation in Biology and the Rational Search for themPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1971