History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organizational Research Methods
- Vol. 7 (3), 238-257
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104266510
Abstract
The search for a meaningful index of the relative importance of predictors in multiple regression has been going on for years. This type of index is often desired when the explanatory aspects of regression analysis are of interest. The authors define relative importance as the proportionate contribution each predictor makes to R2, considering both the unique contribution of each predictor by itself and its incremental contribution when combined with the other predictors. The purposes of this article are to introduce the concept of relative importance to an audience of researchers in organizational behavior and industrial/organizational psychology and to update previous reviews of relative importance indices. To this end, the authors briefly review the history of research on predictor importance in multiple regression and evaluate alternative measures of relative importance. Dominance analysis and relative weights appear to be the most successful measures of relative importance currently available. The authors conclude by discussing how importance indices can be used in organizational research.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Practical Utility of Importance Measures in Assessing the Relative Importance of Work-Related Perceptions and Organizational Characteristics on Work-Related OutcomesOrganizational Research Methods, 2004
- The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression.Psychological Methods, 2003
- Which Dominates? The Relative Importance of Work–Family Organizational Support and General Organizational Context on Employee OutcomesJournal of Vocational Behavior, 2002
- Criticality of predictors in multiple regressionBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2001
- Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: β is not EnoughEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2001
- Hypercompetitiveness in Academia: Achieving Criterion-Related Validity From Item Context SpecificityJournal of Personality Assessment, 1999
- Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995
- Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression.Psychological Bulletin, 1993
- Interpreting and Using RegressionPublished by SAGE Publications ,1982
- Multiple regression in psychological research and practice.Psychological Bulletin, 1968