Should Shoulder Balance Determine Proximal Fusion Levels in Patients With Lenke 5 Curves?
- 1 November 2013
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Spine Deformity
- Vol. 1 (6), 447-451
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.08.003
Abstract
Multicenter review of prospectively collected data. To identify the frequency of an opposite high shoulder in Lenke 5 patients and evaluate factors that influence preoperative and postoperative shoulder balance. A high left shoulder is an indication to extend the fusion proximally in a right thoracic curve. Some apply a similar rule to high right shoulders in patients with left thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. A prospective multicenter adolescent idiopathic scoliosis database was queried for patients with Lenke 5 curves and minimum 2-year follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative shoulder height differences were recorded and categorized by the opposite shoulder (right shoulder in a left thoracolumbar curve) as high (greater than 1 cm), level (0-1 cm), and low (less than 1 cm). Preoperative and postoperative radiographic variables and Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire scores were evaluated. Of the 104 patients identified, 37% had level shoulders and 53% had a high opposite shoulder. A high shoulder was associated with a greater mean thoracic Cobb (31°) than a level (24°) or low shoulder (26°) (p = .008). Postoperatively, 64% of patients had level shoulders (less than 1 cm); 93% had a shoulder difference less than 2 cm. Preoperative lumbar Cobb was a significant predictor of postoperative shoulder height (p = .051). A slightly greater proportion of preoperative high shoulders (36%) had a nonselective fusion than those with level (27%) or low (9%) shoulders. Among the 29 patients with a preoperative moderate or significant high shoulder (greater than 2 cm), 3 continued to have a high shoulder greater than 2 cm that was not influenced by fusing the thoracic spine. There were no significant differences in preoperative or postoperative Scoliosis Research Society scores based on shoulder height (p > .05). Half of all Lenke 5 curves have a high opposite shoulder that is influenced by the size of the compensatory thoracic curve. Postoperatively, most patients had level shoulders. Inclusion of the thoracic spine did not influence postoperative shoulder balance.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes of Upper Thoracic Curve and Shoulder Balance in Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated by Anterior Selective Thoracic Fusion Using VATSJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2011
- Taking the shoulders and pelvis into account in the preoperative classification of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents and young adults (a constructive critique of King’s and Lenke’s systems of classification)European Spine Journal, 2011
- Shoulder balance after surgery in patients with Lenke Type 2 scoliosis corrected with the segmental pedicle screw techniqueJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2009
- Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosisEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- Discrepancy between radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curveEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- How to Determine the Upper Level of Instrumentation in Lenke Types 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2008
- The Validity of Lenke Criteria for Defining Structural Proximal Thoracic Curves in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisSpine, 2005
- Correlation of Radiographic, Clinical, and Patient Assessment of Shoulder Balance Following Fusion Versus Nonfusion of the Proximal Thoracic Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisSpine, 2002
- Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 2001
- Indications of Proximal Thoracic Curve Fusion in Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisSpine, 2000