Collaborative Reasoning: Evidence for Collective Rationality
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Thinking & Reasoning
- Vol. 4 (3), 231-248
- https://doi.org/10.1080/135467898394148
Abstract
Reasoning may be defined as a deliberate effort to coordinate inferences so as to reach justifiable conclusions. Thus defined, reasoning includes collaborative as well as individual forms of cognitive action. The purpose of the present study was to demonstrate a circumstance in which collaborative reasoning is qualitatively superior to individual reasoning. The selection task, a well known logical hypothesis-testing problem, was presented to 143 college undergraduates—32 individuals and 20 groups of 5 or 6 interacting peers. The correct (falsification) response pattern was selected by only 9% of the individuals but by 75% of the groups. The superior performance of the groups was due to collaborative reasoning rather than to imitation or peer pressure. Groups typically co-constructed a structure of arguments qualitatively more sophisticated than that generated by most individuals. The results support Piagetian and Habermasian views of peer interaction as a locus of rational social processes.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.Psychological Bulletin, 1997
- Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments.Psychological Bulletin, 1997
- Argumentation, Education and ReasoningInformal Logic, 1995
- Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small GroupsReview of Educational Research, 1994
- Argumentation and Social EpistemologyThe Journal of Philosophy, 1994
- Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoningSocial Development, 1993
- Development of formal reasoning during successive peer interactions.Developmental Psychology, 1991
- Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoningCognitive Psychology, 1986
- Pragmatic reasoning schemasCognitive Psychology, 1985
- Students' understanding of the logic of hypothesis testingJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1979