Prosthesis–Patient Mismatch is Not Clinically Relevant in Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Valve
- 31 August 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 82 (2), 530-536
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.089
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of the Improvement of Valve Area Achieved With Aortic Valve Replacement on the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Pure Aortic StenosisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacementThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003
- Impact of Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Short-Term Mortality After Aortic Valve ReplacementCirculation, 2003
- Prosthesis-patient size: measurement and clinical implicationsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003
- Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevantThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its preventionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Patient–prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small-size aortic valve prosthesesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1999
- Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart DiseaseCirculation, 1998
- Validation of applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.Circulation, 1978