Transfers, training and inscriptions
- 2 May 2008
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Critical Perspectives on International Business
- Vol. 4 (2/3), 166-183
- https://doi.org/10.1108/17422040810870051
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an alternative understanding of knowledge transfers in developing contexts by drawing on recent deconstructions of the development sciences in anthropology and postcolonial studies to analyze transfers of management knowledge in Malaysia. Contrary to most mainstream research that conceives of transfers as a literal or objective process of skills deployment and acquisition, it refers attention to the modernist assumptions, concepts and practices of knowledge/power that are attached to knowledge transfers. Design/methodology/approach – The study is based on primary and secondary data from two electronics multinational and statutory agencies in Malaysia. Primary data were collected via interviews with training officials and managers; observations were based on training and training-related events like orientation. Secondary data include multinational and statutory agency literature, quality control circle reports and a corporate orientation video. Data analysis included discourse analysis and deconstruction. Findings – Findings highlight the importance of situating knowledge transfers within the discursive and socially organized terrain (local and global) – economic, institutional, disciplinary – that transfers are embedded in, and the significance of knowledge transfers and the attendant focus on training as sites for cultivating and producing the modern market subjects needed to have and to sustain neoliberal forms of development and globalization. The paper re-situates interests in knowledge transfers in terms of a need by state officials and foreign multinationals to actively produce and reconstitute local subjects into modern market citizens that are able and capable of contributing – as required – to the development and organizational needs of said institutions. Originality/value – By extrapolating insights from recent deconstructions of the development sciences and postcolonial studies, the paper provides an alternative way of researching the process, and understanding the significance of transfers: one that showcases the close imbrications between knowledge, power, subjectification, and interconnections between local institutions/constituents (e.g. statutory agencies, government ministries, training personnel) and global capital (e.g. multinationals).Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION AND EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL ALLIANCES AND NETWORKS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1997
- Government and Society in Malaysia.Pacific Affairs, 1997
- The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories.The American Historical Review, 1995
- Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the Anthropology of Cyberculture [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1994
- Foucault, Power/Knowledge, and Its Relevance for Human Resource ManagementAcademy of Management Review, 1993
- General and Industrial ManagementAcademy of Management Review, 1986
- The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and TheoriesJournal of International Business Studies, 1983
- A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study of Managerial Job AttitudesJournal of International Business Studies, 1983
- The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1979
- The Social Psychology of OrganizationsThe American Journal of Psychology, 1967