A noisy transform predicts saccadic and manual reaction times to changes in contrast
Open Access
- 7 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 573 (3), 741-751
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.105387
Abstract
One of the most important factors affecting the time taken to respond to a visual stimulus is contrast, and studies of reaction time can provide precise, quantitative information about the underlying signal processing. In this study we measured both saccadic and manual reaction times to step increments in target contrast. Our results over a range of initial contrasts are consistent with a simple model consisting of a noisy logarithmic transducer followed by a rise‐to‐threshold accumulator. A systematic comparison with previous contrast‐processing models also shows that the commonly used method of linear regression may not be a particularly sensitive tool in deciding between them. We found similar parameters for the contrast processor in both saccadic and manual reaction times, as might be expected if a common target detection stage precedes each type of reaction.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movementsNature, 1995
- Contrast dependence and mechanisms of masking interactions among chromatic and luminance gratingsJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1988
- Sensory latency and reaction time: dependence on contrast polarity and early linearity in human visionJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1987
- Bloch’s law and a temporal integration model for simple reaction time to lightPerception & Psychophysics, 1973
- Retinal Noise and Absolute ThresholdJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1956
- Effect of Flash and Field Luminance upon Human Reaction Time*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1954
- On Cumulative Sums of Random VariablesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1944
- Simple reaction time to change as a substitute for the disjunctive reaction.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1944
- THE INFLUENCE OF THE INTENSITY OF THE STIMULUS ON THE LENGTH OF THE REACTION TIMEBrain, 1886