The use of non‐invasive instruments in characterizing human facial and abdominal skin
- 16 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
- Vol. 44 (2), 131-142
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.21147
Abstract
The skin is highly variable. This variation, although helpful for function, causes inconsistencies when assessed using subjective scales. The purpose of this study is to measure differences in skin on the face and abdomen using non‐invasive, objective devices as a method to eliminate subjective error and help reduce intra‐ and inter‐observer variability in clinical analysis. Eighty‐eight subjects between the ages of 18 and 61 were enrolled in this study. These subjects varied in age, ethnicity, and Fitzpatrick score. Facial analysis was performed by clinical evaluation and utilizing non‐invasive objective devices which included the DermaScan C 20 MHz HFUS (Cyberderm, Broomall, PA), Tru Vu (Johnson and Johnson), BTC 2000 (SRLI Technologies, Nashville, TN), Derma Unit SSC3 (CK Electronic, Köln, Germany), and the Chromometer. Non‐invasive devices were shown to be consistent and accurate through repeated measurement at each of the anatomical points with error rates of less than 5%. Chromometer measurements were able to categorize patients into Fitzpatrick level. DermaScan measurements demonstrated decreasing skin thicknesses associated with increasing age, smoking, and female gender. Derma Unit SSC 3 showed gender and sun exposure related differences in sebum concentration, pH, and moisture content. The Derma Unit SSC 3 sebum concentration also showed correlation with Tru Vu readings for clogged pores and bacterial activity. The skin assessment scales that are in use today are often prone to variability and inaccuracy due to their subjectivity. Use of the described objective non‐invasive facial analysis method provides an accurate, objective analysis of human skin which can be used to measure changes pre‐ and post‐operatively, or even screen patients prior to procedure to identify non‐responders or those prone to adverse events. Utilization of these devices introduces a foundation on which a strong evidence‐based approach to aesthetic medicine can be built. Lasers Surg. Med. 44:131–142, 2012.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current Tools for Noninvasive Objective Assessment of Skin ScarsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- The Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: A Clinical Validated Measurement Tool for Nasolabial Wrinkle Severity AssessmentDermatologic Surgery, 2008
- Reproducibility of Two Four-Point Clinical Severity Scores for Lateral Canthal Lines (Crow's Feet)Dermatologic Surgery, 2006
- The wrinkle and its measurement—Micron, 2004
- Reproducibility of a four-point clinical severity score for glabellar frown linesBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2003
- Training the Generation X Plastic Surgeon: Dispelling the Myths?Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2001
- Females have lower skin surface pH than menSkin Research and Technology, 2001
- Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing of Photoaged Facial SkinArchives of Dermatology, 1996
- Optical profilometry: An objective method for quantification of facial wrinklesJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1989
- Objective evaluation of methods used to treat cutaneous wrinklesClinics in Dermatology, 1988