Responsiveness of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality of Life Scale (AAQoL)
- 12 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 16 (9), 1511-1520
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9254-9
Abstract
This study examined responsiveness of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality of Life Scale (AAQoL), which was developed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Adults with ADHD completed the AAQoL, Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS), SF-36, and Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS) at baseline and week 8 of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of atomoxetine. Clinicians rated symptom severity and improvement (CGI-ADHD-S, CGI-ADHD-I). Responsiveness was examined through effect sizes and association with change in the measures listed previously (Spearman correlations, GLMs). Analyses included 328 patients (58.8% male; mean age = 36.9 years). All AAQoL scales reflected significant improvement from baseline to week 8 (P < 0.0001). AAQoL change scores were significantly correlated with change in the CGI-ADHD-S (r = −0.37 to −0.50), EWPS (r = −0.43 to −0.63), and CAARS (r = −0.35 to −0.62) (all P < 0.001). AAQoL change scores significantly discriminated among patients with various levels of symptom improvement. AAQoL effect sizes (−0.67 to −1.11) were larger than effect sizes for the SF-36 (0.15 to −0.39). The AAQoL was responsive to change in symptoms of ADHD, and it appears to be a useful outcome measure for treatments of ADHD in adults.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of Self-Report and Informant Rating Scales of Adult ADHD Symptoms in Comparison With a Semistructured Diagnostic InterviewJournal of Attention Disorders, 2006
- Stimulant treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderPsychiatric Clinics of North America, 2004
- AtomoxetineDrugs, 2004
- Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status MeasuresMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- The Assessment of Hyperactivity and Attention: Development and preliminary validation of a brief self- assessment of adult ADHDJournal of Attention Disorders, 2001
- Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendationsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important differenceControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performanceJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986