From Pilot to the National Emissions Trading Scheme in China: International Practice and Domestic Experiences
Open Access
- 31 May 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 8 (6), 522
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060522
Abstract
In order to tackle climate change and build a low-carbon economy, China has selected seven provinces and cities as carbon trading pilots and plans to establish the national emissions trading scheme (ETS) in 2017. However, since China has not yet reached peak carbon emissions, and as a major developing country, the conflict between increasing energy demand and the requirement to reduce emissions brings challenges to the design of a national ETS suitable for China’s development. In this paper, we summarize the current situation of China’s seven ETS pilots with respect to coverage, allowance allocation, transactions, punishment mechanisms and especially the market performance. By analyzing the common practice of three international mandatory schemes, combined with China’s current circumstances and characteristics of market construction and regulation, we emphasize China’s own economic reality, and propose several recommendations for building a suitable and effective national ETS. This paper could provide new perspectives towards scheme design for China and other similar countries.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of China's carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprisesEnergy Policy, 2015
- Policy design of the Hubei ETS pilot in ChinaEnergy Policy, 2014
- Emissions intensity targeting: From China's 12th Five Year Plan to its Copenhagen commitmentEnergy Policy, 2013
- Strategic climate policy with offsets and incomplete abatement: Carbon taxes versus cap-and-tradeJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2013
- BANKING AND BORROWING IN THE EU ETS: A REVIEW OF ECONOMIC MODELLING, CURRENT PROVISIONS AND PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE DESIGNJournal of Economic Surveys, 2010