Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Topics
- 21 June 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 142 (12_Part_2), 1042-1047
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_part_2-200506211-00003
Abstract
The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) continues to grow in the United States. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has devoted a substantial proportion of the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) program to systematic reviews of CAM. Such syntheses present different challenges from those conducted on western medicine topics, and in many ways are more difficult. We discuss 3 challenges: identifying evidence about CAM, assessing the quality of individual studies, and addressing rare serious adverse events. We use illustrations from EPC evidence reports to show readers approaches to the 3 areas and then present specific recommendations for each issue.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviewsHealth Technology Assessment, 2003
- Searching biomedical databases on complementary medicine: the use of controlled vocabulary among authors, indexers and investigatorsBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2003
- Randomized controlled trials in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine: Where can they be found?BMC Pediatrics, 2003
- A Controlled Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the KneeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Description and Validation of a Noninvasive Placebo Acupuncture ProcedureThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2002
- Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national surveyComplementary Therapies in Medicine, 1999
- Complementary Medicine and the Cochrane CollaborationJAMA, 1998
- Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled TrialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1998
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Publication bias and clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1987