Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes.
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 8 (1-2), 31-51
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044350
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- After Hovey: A note on taking account of the automatic death penalty jurors.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Death penalty attitudes and conviction proneness: The translation of attitudes into verdicts.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Juries Hearing Death Penalty Cases: Statistical Analysis of a Legal ProcedureJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- Public Opinion and Capital Punishment: A Close Examination of the Views of Abolitionists and RetentionistsCrime & Delinquency, 1983
- Support for the Death Penalty; Instrumental Response to Crime, or Symbolic Attitude?Law & Society Review, 1982
- Public Opinion and the Death PenaltyStanford Law Review, 1974
- Effects of inadmissible Evidence on the Decisions of Simulated Jurors: A Moral DilemmaJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973
- New Data on the Effect of a "Death Qualified" Jury on the Guilt Determination ProcessHarvard Law Review, 1971
- The Limits of the Criminal SanctionPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1968