Evaluation of the lasso and the elastic net in genome-wide association studies
Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Genetics
- Vol. 4, 270
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00270
Abstract
The number of publications performing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has increased dramatically. Penalized regression approaches have been developed to overcome the challenges caused by the high dimensional data, but these methods are relatively new in the GWAS field. In this study we have compared the statistical performance of two methods (the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator—lasso and the elastic net) on two simulated data sets and one real data set from a 50 K genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel of 5570 Fleckvieh bulls. The first simulated data set displays moderate to high linkage disequilibrium between SNPs, whereas the second simulated data set from the QTLMAS 2010 workshop is biologically more complex. We used cross-validation to find the optimal value of regularization parameter λ with both minimum MSE and minimum MSE + 1SE of minimum MSE. The optimal λ values were used for variable selection. Based on the first simulated data, we found that the minMSE in general picked up too many SNPs. At minMSE + 1SE, the lasso didn't acquire any false positives, but selected too few correct SNPs. The elastic net provided the best compromise between few false positives and many correct selections when the penalty weight α was around 0.1. However, in our simulation setting, this α value didn't result in the lowest minMSE + 1SE. The number of selected SNPs from the QTLMAS 2010 data was after correction for population structure 82 and 161 for the lasso and the elastic net, respectively. In the Fleckvieh data set after population structure correction lasso and the elastic net identified from 1291 to 1966 important SNPs for milk fat content, with major peaks on chromosomes 5, 14, 15, and 20. Hence, we can conclude that it is important to analyze GWAS data with both the lasso and the elastic net and an alternative tuning criterion to minimum MSE is needed for variable selection.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reprioritizing Genetic Associations in Hit Regions Using LASSO‐Based Resample Model AveragingGenetic Epidemiology, 2012
- Brief review of regression‐based and machine learning methods in genetic epidemiology: the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 experienceGenetic Epidemiology, 2011
- SNP Selection in genome‐wide and candidate gene studies via penalized logistic regressionGenetic Epidemiology, 2010
- Risk prediction using genome‐wide association studiesGenetic Epidemiology, 2010
- Overview of techniques to account for confounding due to population stratification and cryptic relatedness in genomic data association analysesHeredity, 2010
- New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studiesNature Reviews Genetics, 2010
- Multi-population GWA mapping via multi-task regularized regressionBioinformatics, 2010
- Prioritizing GWAS Results: A Review of Statistical Methods and Recommendations for Their ApplicationAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2010
- Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studiesBioinformatics, 2010
- Accommodating Linkage Disequilibrium in Genetic-Association Analyses via Ridge RegressionAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2008