The reclamation success of abandoned wellsites in agricultural areas depends on their capacity to sustain levels of biomass production similar to those which existed prior to soil disturbance. We examined the effect of four (0, 50, 100 and 150%) topsoil replacement depths (TRD) and five amendment treatments [compost, manure, alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) hay, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw, check) in the reclamation of three wellsites in south-central Alberta. The largest incremental effect of TRD on spring wheat response in the 4 yr (1997-2000) study occurred between the 0 and 50% treatments. Increasing TRD from 100 to 150% had little impact on crop response. Of the 20 treatments (four TRD × five amendments), the reclamation capacity of the 100% TRD-compost treatment ranked highest, being 19% higher than the baseline treatment (100% TRD-check). The lowest-ranking treatment overall , was the 0% TRD-straw treatment, which yielded 64% of the baseline treatment. Crop yield responses to organic amendments were larger when the recipient soil was lower in organic matter. Positive responses to one-time applications of organic amendments in the short-term (4 yr), advocate their use in soil reclamation of abandoned wellsites, despite a lingering question about the longevity of their beneficial effects. Key words: Soil reclamation, topsoil, organic amendments, natural gas wellsite