Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- 1 April 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in International Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 164 (2), 158-169
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.01.020
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2009
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Beneficial effects of modern perfusion concepts in aortic valve and aortic root surgeryPerfusion, 2009
- Outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery with miniaturized versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypassPerfusion, 2008
- Arcsine test for publication bias in meta‐analyses with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Minimally invasive cardiopulmonary bypass: does it really change the outcome?Critical Care, 2007
- Mini–Cardiopulmonary Bypass System: Results of a Prospective Randomized StudyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2006
- Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypassAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986