A large-scale assessment of hand hygiene quality and the effectiveness of the “WHO 6-steps”
Open Access
- 30 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 13 (1), 249-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-249
Abstract
Background Hand hygiene compliance is generally assessed by observation of adherence to the “WHO five moments” using numbers of opportunities as the denominator. The quality of the activity is usually not monitored since there is no established methodology for the routine assessment of hand hygiene technique. The aim of this study was to objectively assess hand rub coverage of staff using a novel imaging technology and to look for patterns and trends in missed areas after the use of WHO’s 6 Step technique. Methods A hand hygiene education and assessment program targeted 5200 clinical staff over 7 days at the National University Hospital, Singapore. Participants in small groups were guided by professional trainers through 5 educational stations, which included technique-training and UV light assessment supported by digital photography of hands. Objective criteria for satisfactory hand hygiene quality were defined a priori. The database of images created during the assessment program was analyzed subsequently. Patterns of poor hand hygiene quality were identified and linked to staff demographic. Results Despite the assessment taking place immediately after the training, only 72% of staff achieved satisfactory coverage. Failure to adequately clean the dorsal and palmar aspects of the hand occurred in 24% and 18% of the instances, respectively. Fingertips were missed by 3.5% of subjects. The analysis based on 4642 records showed that nurses performed best (77% pass), and women performed better than men (75% vs. 62%, p<0.001). Further risk indicators have been identified regarding age and occupation. Conclusion Ongoing education and training has a vital role in improving hand hygiene compliance and technique of clinical staff. Identification of typical sites of failure can help to develop improved training.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative studies of hand disinfection and handwashing procedures as tested by pupils in intervention programsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2011
- Introduction of an electronic monitoring system for monitoring compliance with Moments 1 and 4 of the WHO "My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene" methodologyBMC Infectious Diseases, 2011
- An Investigation of Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Disinfection Procedures in ItalyBMC Infectious Diseases, 2011
- Factors interfering with the microflora on hands: a regression analysis of samples from 465 healthcare workersJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2010
- Effectiveness of alcohol-based hand disinfectants in a public administration: Impact on health and work performance related to acute respiratory symptoms and diarrhoeaBMC Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Efficacy of ethanol-based hand foams using clinically relevant amounts: a cross-over controlled study among healthy volunteersBMC Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Compliance with hand hygiene on surgical, medical, and neurologic intensive care units: Direct observation versus calculated disinfectant usageAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2009
- Influence of rub-in technique on required application time and hand coverage in hygienic hand disinfectionBMC Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Measuring handwashing performance in health service audits and research studiesJournal of Hospital Infection, 2007
- Impact of Ring Wearing on Hand Contamination and Comparison of Hand Hygiene Agents in a HospitalClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003