A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction
- 12 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 212 (1), 138-150
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.030
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2,000 casesSurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Bologna Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (ASBO): 2010 Evidence-Based Guidelines of the World Society of Emergency SurgeryWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2011
- Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: Review of 1061 casesSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: patients’ outcome and cost-effectivenessSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Small Bowel Obstruction: Conservative vs. Surgical ManagementDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2005
- Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?Surgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstructionBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstructionSurgical Endoscopy, 2000
- Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgeryDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1999