Renin as a Marker of Tissue-Perfusion and Prognosis in Critically Ill Patients*
- 1 February 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 47 (2), 152-158
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000003544
Abstract
To characterize renin in critically ill patients. Renin is fundamental to circulatory homeostasis and could be a useful marker of tissue-perfusion. However, diurnal variation, continuous renal replacement therapy and drug-interference could confound its use in critical care practice. Prospective observational study. Single-center, mixed medical-surgical ICU in Europe. Patients over 18 years old with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and anticipated ICU stay greater than 24 hours. Informed consent was obtained from the patient or next-of-kin. Direct plasma renin was measured in samples drawn 6-hourly from arterial catheters in recumbent patients and from extracorporeal continuous renal replacement therapy circuits. Physiologic variables and use of drugs that act on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system were recorded prospectively. Routine lactate measurements were used for comparison. One-hundred twelve arterial samples (n = 112) were drawn from 20 patients (65% male; mean ± SD, 60 ± 14 yr old) with septic shock (30%), hemorrhagic shock (15%), cardiogenic shock (20%), or no circulatory shock (35%). The ICU mortality rate was 30%. Renin correlated significantly with urine output (repeated-measures correlation coefficient = –0.29; p = 0.015) and mean arterial blood pressure (repeated-measures correlation coefficient = –0.35; p < 0.001). There was no diurnal variation of renin or significant interaction of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system drugs with renin in this population. Continuous renal replacement therapy renin removal was negligible (mass clearance ± SD 4% ± 4.3%). There was a significant difference in the rate of change of renin over time between survivors and nonsurvivors (–32 ± 26 μU/timepoint vs +92 ± 57 μU/timepoint p = 0.03; mean ± SEM), but not for lactate (–0.14 ± 0.04 mM/timepoint vs +0.15 ± 0.21 mM/timepoint; p = 0.07). Maximum renin achieved significant prognostic value for ICU mortality (receiver operator curve area under the curve 0.80; p = 0.04), whereas maximum lactate did not (receiver operator curve area under the curve, 0.70; p = 0.17). In an heterogeneous ICU population, renin measurement was not significantly affected by diurnal variation, continuous renal replacement therapy, or drugs. Renin served as a marker of tissue-perfusion and outperformed lactate as a predictor of ICU mortality.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Re-thinking resuscitation: leaving blood pressure cosmetics behind and moving forward to permissive hypotension and a tissue perfusion-based approachCritical Care, 2013
- Clinical use of lactate monitoring in critically ill patientsAnnals of Intensive Care, 2013
- Lactate as a hemodynamic marker in the critically illCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2012
- Emergence and evolution of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone systemJournal of Molecular Medicine, 2012
- (Pro)renin and its receptors: pathophysiological implicationsClinical Science, 2012
- On summary measure analysis of linear trend repeated measures data: performance comparison with two competing methodsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012
- Renin-angiotensin system activation correlates with microvascular dysfunction in a prospective cohort study of clinical sepsisCritical Care, 2010
- The renal renin-angiotensin systemAdvances in Physiology Education, 2009
- Ventricular histamine concentrations in naive and morphine-treated rats during acute myocardial ischaemiaInflammation Research, 1988
- A diurnal rhythm in plasma renin activity in man.JCI Insight, 1966