Discrepancy Between the Quantitative Ultrasound Value of Malaysian Men and the Manufacturer’s Reference and the Impact on Classification of Bone Health Status
- 1 April 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Densitometry
- Vol. 16 (2), 189-195
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2012.03.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative ultrasound of the heel and fracture risk assessment: an updated meta-analysisOsteoporosis International, 2011
- High correlation between quantitative ultrasound and DXA during 7 years of follow-upEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2010
- Mortality Risk Associated With Low-Trauma Osteoporotic Fracture and Subsequent Fracture in Men and WomenJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2009
- Quantitative Ultrasound in the Management of Osteoporosis: The 2007 ISCD Official PositionsJournal of Clinical Densitometry, 2008
- Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2007
- Determining the Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Related Factors using Quantitative Ultrasound in Vietnamese Adult WomenAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- An overview of bone sonometryInternational Congress Series, 2004
- Ultrasonic measurement of the calcaneus in polish normal and osteoporotic women and menBone, 1999
- Bone Density and Fracture Risk in MenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques for the Assessment of Osteoporosis: Expert Agreement on Current StatusJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997