Variation and Imprecision of Clerkship Grading in U.S. Medical Schools
- 1 August 2012
- journal article
- evaluation
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 87 (8), 1070-1076
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31825d0a2a
Abstract
Purpose Despite standardized curricula and mandated accreditation, concern exists regarding the variability and imprecision of medical student evaluation. The authors set out to perform a complete review of clerkship evaluation in U.S. medical schools. Method Clerkship evaluation data were obtained from all Association of American Medical Colleges–affiliated medical schools reporting enrollment during 2009–2010. Deidentified reports were analyzed to define the grading system and the percentage of each class within each grading tier. Inter- and intraschool grading variation was assessed in part by comparing the proportion of students receiving the top grade. Results Data were analyzed from 119 of 123 accredited medical schools. Dramatic variation was detected. Specifically, the authors documented eight different grading systems using 27 unique sets of descriptive terminology. Imprecision of grading was apparent. Institutions frequently used the same wording (e.g., “honors”) to imply different meanings. The percentage of students awarded the top grade in any clerkship exhibited extreme variability (range 2%–93%) from school to school, as well as from clerkship to clerkship within the same school (range 18%–81%). Ninety-seven percent of all U.S. clerkship students were awarded one of the top three grades regardless of the number of grading tiers. Nationally, less than 1% of students failed any required clerkship. Conclusions There exists great heterogeneity of grading systems and imprecision of grade meaning throughout the U.S. medical education system. Systematic changes seeking to increase consistency, transparency, and reliability of grade meaning are needed to improve the student evaluation process at the national level.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in Faculty Evaluations of Clerkship Students Attributable to Surgical ServiceJournal of Surgical Education, 2010
- Brief report: Use of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise in internal medicine core clerkshipsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- An Approach to Address Grade Inflation in a Psychiatry ClerkshipAcademic Psychiatry, 2006
- Promoting Fundamental Clinical Skills: A Competency-Based College Approach at the University of WashingtonAcademic Medicine, 2005
- Student Evaluation Practices in Pediatric Clerkships: A Survey of the Medical Schools in the United States and CanadaClinical Pediatrics, 2004
- Assessing Competence in Communication and Interpersonal Skills: The Kalamazoo II ReportAcademic Medicine, 2004
- Variation in medical student grading criteria: a survey of clerkships in obstetrics and gynecologyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Grade Inflation in Internal Medicine Clerkships: Results of a National SurveyTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 2000
- A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluationsAcademic Medicine, 1999
- A national survey of grading systems used in medicine clerkshipsAcademic Medicine, 1990