A Fair Comparison of Pull and Push Strategies in Large Distributed Networks

Abstract
In this paper, we compare the performance of the pull and push strategies in a large homogeneous distributed system. When a pull strategy is in use, lightly loaded nodes attempt to steal jobs from more highly loaded nodes, while under the push strategy, more highly loaded nodes look for lightly loaded nodes to process some of their jobs. Given the maximum allowed overall probe rate R and arrival rate λ, we provide closed-form solutions for the mean response time of a job for the push and pull strategy under the infinite system model. More specifically, we show that the push strategy outperforms the pull strategy for any probe rate % > 0 when λ <; φ-1, where φ = (1 +√5)/2 ≈ 1.6180 is the golden ratio. More generally, we show that the push strategy prevails if and only if 2λ <; √(R+1) 2 + 4(R+1) √ (R+1). We also show that under the infinite system model, a hybrid pull-and-push strategy is always inferior to the pure pull or push strategy. The relation between the finite and infinite system model is discussed, and simulation results that validate the infinite system model are provided.

This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit: