Social Media Release Increases Dissemination of Original Articles in the Clinical Pain Sciences
Open Access
- 17 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (7), e68914
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068914
Abstract
A barrier to dissemination of research is that it depends on the end-user searching for or ‘pulling’ relevant knowledge from the literature base. Social media instead ‘pushes’ relevant knowledge straight to the end-user, via blogs and sites such as Facebook and Twitter. That social media is very effective at improving dissemination seems well accepted, but, remarkably, there is no evidence to support this claim. We aimed to quantify the impact of social media release on views and downloads of articles in the clinical pain sciences. Sixteen PLOS ONE articles were blogged and released via Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and ResearchBlogging.org on one of two randomly selected dates. The other date served as a control. The primary outcomes were the rate of HTML views and PDF downloads of the article, over a seven-day period. The critical result was an increase in both outcome variables in the week after the blog post and social media release. The mean ± SD rate of HTML views in the week after the social media release was 18±18 per day, whereas the rate during the other three weeks was no more than 6±3 per day. The mean ± SD rate of PDF downloads in the week after the social media release was 4±4 per day, whereas the rate during the other three weeks was less than 1±1 per day (p0.3 for all). We conclude that social media release of a research article in the clinical pain sciences increases the number of people who view or download that article, but conventional social media metrics are unrelated to the effect.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific ImpactJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2011
- Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2010
- Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and OpennessJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2008
- From intermediation to disintermediation and apomediation: new models for consumers to access and assess the credibility of health information in the age of Web2.0.2007
- Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural MarketScience, 2006
- How Can Research Organizations More Effectively Transfer Research Knowledge to Decision Makers?The Milbank Quarterly, 2003