Inferring Reputation Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Social Dilemma Games
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (7), e40218
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040218
Abstract
In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others’ reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1−p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.Keywords
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- If players are sparse social dilemmas are too: Importance of percolation for evolution of cooperationScientific Reports, 2012
- Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial InteractionsPLoS Computational Biology, 2010
- Human strategy updating in evolutionary gamesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Complex Cooperative Networks from Evolutionary Preferential AttachmentPLOS ONE, 2008
- Learning and Innovative Elements of Strategy Adoption Rules Expand Cooperative Network TopologiesPLOS ONE, 2008
- Mesoscopic Structure Conditions the Emergence of Cooperation on Social NetworksPLOS ONE, 2008
- Tit-for-tat or win-stay, lose-shift?Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2007
- Five Rules for the Evolution of CooperationScience, 2006
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964