Quantitative UPLC-MS/MS analysis of underivatised amino acids in body fluids is a reliable tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with inborn errors of metabolism
- 3 September 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 407 (1-2), 36-42
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2009.06.023
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metabolomic profiles delineate potential role for sarcosine in prostate cancer progressionNature, 2009
- Quality of analytical performance in inherited metabolic disorders: the role of ERNDIMJournal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 2008
- Analysis of Underivatized Amino Acids in Geological Samples Using Ion-Pairing Liquid Chromatography and Electrospray Tandem Mass SpectrometryAstrobiology, 2008
- Acylcarnitine profile analysisGenetics in Medicine, 2008
- A new reversed‐phase liquid chromatographic/tandem mass spectrometric method for analysis of underivatised amino acids: evaluation for the diagnosis and the management of inherited disorders of amino acid metabolismRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2005
- Peak capacity in gradient ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2005
- Ion‐pairing reversed‐phase liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometric analysis of 76 underivatized amino acids of biological interest: a new tool for the diagnosis of inherited disorders of amino acid metabolismRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2005
- Ultra‐performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole‐orthogonal time‐of‐flight mass spectrometryRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2004
- ESI‐MS/MS analysis of underivatised amino acids: a new tool for the diagnosis of inherited disorders of amino acid metabolism. Fragmentation study of 79 molecules of biological interest in positive and negative ionisation modeRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2003
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986