Privatization and firm performance: A comparison between rural and urban enterprises in China
- 30 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Comparative Economics
- Vol. 34 (3), 608-633
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.06.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Privatization Raise Productivity? Evidence from Comprehensive Panel Data on Manufacturing Firms in Hungary, Romania, Russia, and UkrainePublished by W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research ,2004
- How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Incentive contracting versus ownership reforms: evidence from China's township and village enterprisesJournal of Comparative Economics, 2003
- 'Letting Go of the Small': An Analysis of the Privatisation of Rural Enterprises in Jiangsu and ShandongThe Journal of Development Studies, 2003
- Priorities and Sequencing in Privatization: Theory and Evidence from the Czech RepublicSSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Leaders, managers, and the organization of township and village enterprises in ChinaJournal of Development Economics, 1999
- When Does Privatization Work? The Impact of Private Ownership on Corporate Performance in the Transition EconomiesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- How Does Privatization Work? Evidence from the Russian ShopsJournal of Political Economy, 1996
- On insider privatizationEuropean Economic Review, 1996
- Robust Estimation of a Location ParameterThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1964