Role of Bridge Energetics on the Preference for Hole or Electron Transfer Leading to Charge Recombination in Donor-Bridge-Acceptor Molecules
- 27 February 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Vol. 116 (9), 2184-2191
- https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2125735
Abstract
The impact of donor–acceptor electronic coupling and bridge energetics on the preference for hole or electron transfer leading to charge recombination in a series of donor-bridge-acceptor (D-B-A) molecules was examined. In these systems, the donor is 3,5-dimethyl-4-(9-anthracenyl)-julolidine (DMJ-An) and acceptor is naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) (NI), while the bridges are either oligo(p-phenyleneethynylene) (PEnP, where n = 1–3) 1–3 or oligo(2,7-fluorenone) (FNn, where n = 1–3) 4–6. Photoexcitation of 1–3 and 4–6 produces DMJ+•-An-PEnP-NI–• and DMJ+•-An-FNn-NI–•, respectively, which undergo radical pair intersystem crossing followed by charge recombination to yield both 3*An and 3*NI, which are observed by time-resolved electron paramagnetic resonance (TREPR) spectroscopy. 3*NI is produced by hole transfer from DMJ+• to NI–•, while 3*An is produced by electron transfer from NI–• to DMJ+•, using the agency of the bridge HOMOs and LUMOs, respectively. By monitoring the initial population of 3*NI and 3*An in 1–6, the data show that charge recombination occurs preferentially by selective hole transfer when the bridge is PEnP, while it occurs by preferential electron transfer when the bridge is FNn. Over time, the initial population of 3*NI decreases, while that of 3*An increases, indicating that triplet–triplet energy transfer (TEnT) occurs. The observed distance dependence of TEnT from 3*NI to An is weakly exponential with a decay parameter β = 0.08 Å–1 for the PEnP series and β = 0.03 Å–1 for the FNn series. In the PEnP series, this weak distance dependence is attributed to a transition from the superexchange regime to hopping transport as the energy gap for triplet energy injection onto the bridge becomes significantly smaller as n increases, while in the FNn series the corresponding energy gap is small for all n resulting in triplet energy transport by the hopping mechanism.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparing Spin-Selective Charge Transport through Donor-Bridge-Acceptor Molecules with Different Oligomeric Aromatic BridgesAngewandte Chemie, 2010
- Triplet–triplet energy transfer in Peridinin-Chlorophyll a-protein reconstituted with Chl a and Chl d as revealed by optically detected magnetic resonance and pulse EPR: Comparison with the native PCP complex from Amphidinium carteraeBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 2009
- Role of Exchange and Dipolar Interactions in the Radical Pair Model of the Avian Magnetic CompassBiophysical Journal, 2008
- Conformationally Gated Switching between Superexchange and Hopping within Oligo-p-phenylene-Based Molecular WiresJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2005
- How carotenoids protect bacterial photosynthesisPhilosophical Transactions B, 2000
- Mimicry of carotenoid photoprotection in artificial photosynthetic reaction centers: triplet-triplet energy transfer by a relay mechanismJournal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 1998
- A general model of electron spin polarization arising from the interactions within radical pairsThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1990
- Triplet-triplet energy transfer in B800–850 light-harvesting complexes of photosynthetic bacteria and synthetic carotenoporphyrin molecules investigated by electron spin resonanceBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1987
- Spin-polarized electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of radical pairs in micelles: observation of electron spin-spin interactionsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1987
- Laser photolysis studies of the triplet state of xanthone and its ketyl radical in fluid solutionJournal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2: Molecular and Chemical Physics, 1976