Timeliness of corporate financial reporting in emerging capital markets: empirical evidence from the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange

Abstract

This article reports on the results of an empirical investigation of the timeliness of annual reporting by 47 non-financial companies listed on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange. It also reports on the factors that affect timely reporting by these companies. The results of a descriptive analysis indicate that 98% of the companies in the sample reported promptly to the public (i.e., submitted their audited annual reports to the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange by the regulatory deadline). A two-stage least squares regression identified company size, profitability and company age as statistically significant explanators of the differences in the timeliness of annual reports issued by the sample companies. No evidence was found to support the monitoring costs theory argument, which suggests that highly-geared companies are timely reporters. Furthermore, the empirical data indicate that audit reporting lead time is significantly associated with the timeliness with which sample companies release their preliminary annual earnings announcement, but not with the timeliness of their audited annual reports. Plausible explanations for these findings along with the limitations of the underlying research are provided.