Orally Administered Interferons Suppress Bone Marrow Function

Abstract
The accepted routes of interferon (IFN) administration in clinical applications are intramuscular, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, intratumor, and intravenous. Recently, oral administration of interferons has been shown to cause a suppression of peripheral white blood cell (WBC) counts. Moreover, orally administered interferons mediate their peripheral WBC suppression via a different mechanism than that of intraperitoneally administered interferons. This study extends the previous studies to show that the peripheral WBC suppression induced by oral interferon treatment reflects an actual bone marrow suppression. The bone marrow-suppressive effects of orally and subcutaneously administered recombinant human IFN-alpha A/D (rHuIFN-alpha A/D) have been partially characterized in kinetics studies and compared with the peripheral WBC-suppressive effects of orally and subcutaneously administered rHuIFN-alpha A/D. Oral and subcutaneous administrations of rHuIFN-alpha A/D cause a significant suppression of peripheral WBC counts with 1 day of rHuIFN-alpha A/D administration. This suppression reaches its maximum level with 3 days of rHuIFN-alpha A/D administration and plateaus over a 12-day treatment time. Similarly, oral and subcutaneous administrations of rHuIFN-alpha A/D cause a significant suppression of bone marrow function with 1 day of rHuIFN-alpha A/D administration. This suppression reaches its maximum level with 3 days of rHuIFN-alpha A/D administration and plateaus over a 12-day treatment time. Thus, the WBC-suppressive and bone marrow-suppressive effects of rHuIFN-alpha A/D administered either orally or subcutaneously parallel each other. The peripheral WBC-suppressive activities of orally and subcutaneously administered rHuIFN-alpha A/D diminish at the same rate, after cessation of rHuIFN-alpha A/D treatment. Peripheral WBC suppression is lost by 5 days after cessation of rHuIFN-alpha A/D treatment. The mechanisms by which orally and subcutaneously administered interferons exert their bone marrow-suppressive effects differ, however. Bone marrow suppression mediated by subcutaneous administration of murine IFN-alpha/beta (MuIFN-alpha/beta) is blocked by the presence of circulating antibodies to MuIFN-alpha/beta. In contrast, the bone marrow suppression mediated by oral administration of MuIFN-alpha/beta occurs even in the presence of circulating antibodies to MuIFN-alpha/beta. These results continue to support a potential clinical role for oral administration of interferons, particularly for the control of diseases of myelogenous origin.