A Descriptive Analysis of Oral Health Systematic Reviews Published 1991–2012: Cross Sectional Study
Open Access
- 30 September 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (9), e74545
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074545
Abstract
To identify all systematic reviews (SRs) published in the domain of oral health research and describe them in terms of their epidemiological and descriptive characteristics. Cross sectional, descriptive study. An electronic search of seven databases was performed from inception through May 2012; bibliographies of relevant publications were also reviewed. Studies were considered for inclusion if they were oral health SRs defined as therapeutic or non-therapeutic investigations that studied a topic or an intervention related to dental, oral or craniofacial diseases/disorders. Data were extracted from all the SRs based on a number of epidemiological and descriptive characteristics. Data were analysed descriptively for all the SRs, within each of the nine dental specialities, and for Cochrane and non-Cochrane SRs separately. 1,188 oral health (126 Cochrane and 1062 non-Cochrane) SRs published from 1991 through May 2012 were identified, encompassing the nine dental specialties. Over half (n = 676; 56.9%) of the SRs were published in specialty oral health journals, with almost all (n = 1,178; 99.2%) of the SRs published in English and almost none of the non-Cochrane SRs (n = 11; 0.9%) consisting of updates of previously published SRs. 75.3% of the SRs were categorized as therapeutic, with 64.5% examining non-drug interventions, while approximately half (n = 150/294; 51%) of the non-therapeutic SRs were classified as epidemiological SRs. The SRs included a median of 15 studies, with a meta-analysis conducted in 43.6%, in which a median of 9 studies/1 randomized trial were included in the largest meta-analysis conducted. Funding was received for 25.1% of the SRs, including nearly three-quarters (n = 96; 76.2%) of the Cochrane SRs. Epidemiological and descriptive characteristics of the 1,188 oral health SRs varied across the nine dental specialties and by SR category (Cochrane vs. non-Cochrane). There is a clear need for more updates of SRs in all the dental specialties.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Evaluation of Epidemiological and Reporting Characteristics of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Systematic Reviews (SRs)PLOS ONE, 2013
- Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodonticsOrthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 2011
- A systematic review of orofacial pain in patients receiving cancer therapySupportive Care in Cancer, 2010
- A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsBMC Pediatrics, 2010
- Critically Appraising Systematic ReviewsEvidence-Based Dentistry, 2010
- Editor's Summary and Q&A: Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting BiasPLOS ONE, 2008
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic ReviewsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2002