Internal Fixation of Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm by Interlocking Intramedullary Nail
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
- Vol. 19 (6), 384-391
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000157911.76433.db
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm using the ForeSight forearm interlocking intramedullary nail.Retrospective study.University-affiliated teaching hospital.Eighteen patients with 32 displaced diaphyseal forearm fractures were identified.All fractures were treated with the ForeSight forearm interlocking intramedullary nail. Eighteen fractures were stabilized with static interlocking technique.The assessment of patients was based on the time to union, the functional recovery, and the incidence of complications. Physical capability was evaluated by using the rating system of Grace and Eversmann. Patient-rated outcome was assessed by completion of the Disability of Arm Shoulder Hand questionnaire (DASH).All fractures healed with the index procedure. The average time to union for fractures utilizing a closed technique was 10 weeks; for fractures using an open reduction technique, 15 weeks. The mean pronation was 62 (range, 0-96) degrees, and the mean supination was 80 (range, 0-105) degrees. Compared with the normal arm, the mean loss of rotation of the forearm was 32 (range, 5-162) degrees. Using the rating system of Grace and Eversmann, 13 patients had an excellent or good result, 3 had an acceptable result, and 2 had an unacceptable result. Using the patient-rated functional questionnaire, the mean DASH of 19 (range, 4-72) points at the time of the most recent follow-up indicated a mild-to-moderate impairment. There were 7 postoperative complications. The incidence of complications was 22% (7/32). One cross-union between forearm bones occurred in a patient with a closed head injury and high-energy trauma. Two nondriving end screws of the ulna nail backed out causing wrist pain and had to be removed. There were 4 superficial infections occurring all in the fractures that necessitated an open reduction technique. The overall rate of infection was 12.5% (4/32). Three patients who presented with an open fracture needed a skin graft to cover the open wound.Forearm interlocking intramedullary nailing is an acceptable method to stabilize displaced diaphyseal forearm fractures in adult.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radioulnar Load-Sharing in the Forearm. A Study in Cadavera*The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1998
- Validity of Observer-Based Aggregate Scoring Systems as Descriptors of Elbow Pain, Function, and Disability*Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,1998
- Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone Graft: Complications and Functional AssessmentClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1997
- Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head)American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1996
- A Biomechanical Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation of Fractures of the ForearmJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1995
- A Comparison of Malreduction After Plate and Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Forearm FracturesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1995
- Internal fixation of forearm fractures in the 1980s: lessons to be learntInjury, 1991
- Compression-plate fixation of acute fractures of the diaphyses of the radius and ulna.The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1989
- Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Tibial FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1988
- THE CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE SHAFT OF THE RADIUS AND ULNA IN ADULTSThe Lancet, 1952